Solana's WASTED Token Surges 472% in Early November Trading

Solana-based meme coin WASTED appeared at the top of an early November 3, 2026, daily gainers leaderboard after MEMECOINY reported a 472% increase over the preceding 24-hour period. The same leaderboard listed approximately $1.5 million in trading volume and $115,400 in liquidity for the token, placing it ahead of SAFU and FLOAT in the publication's ranking.

The figures are historical market-data readings, not guaranteed live prices. MEMECOINY states that its November 3 daily brief was assembled at 00:06 UTC, using market data timestamped 23:47 UTC on November 2. The token identified in the report is the Solana asset with mint address GexThZHgaswpAQ7Fi8QrHFubjPimUNSYhJiAA7XZpump.

According to MEMECOINY, WASTED Recorded a 472% Gain

According to MEMECOINY's November 3 daily brief, WASTED recorded a 472.0% 24-hour price increase in the publication's top-movers leaderboard. MEMECOINY ranked the token first among the assets that passed its leaderboard filters, which include minimum liquidity, plausible volume, sufficient transactions and traders, and a trading pair older than a few hours.

The same MEMECOINY leaderboard reported SAFU with a 212.0% gain and FLOAT with a 109.0% gain. Those figures put WASTED substantially ahead of the other two tokens in percentage terms during the measurement window used for that edition.

The historical figures published by MEMECOINY were:

Source: MEMECOINY's November 3, 2026 daily brief. These are the figures reported in that historical leaderboard, not independently verified measurements by MemeBlock.com.

The ranking also needs to be interpreted correctly. WASTED led this list by percentage gain, but MEMECOINY's figures show that SAFU and FLOAT recorded higher 24-hour trading volumes. The leaderboard was a ranking of price gainers, not a ranking of the tokens with the highest turnover.

What the Reported $1.5 Million Volume and $115,400 Liquidity Mean

MEMECOINY's historical leaderboard attributed approximately $1.5 million in 24-hour trading volume and $115,400 in liquidity to WASTED. The publication identifies DexScreener as its source for price, volume and liquidity data, and GeckoTerminal as its source for pool-list information.

These two market measurements describe different things. Trading volume represents the value of transactions recorded during a defined period, while liquidity measures the value available in trading pools. A token can therefore record substantial turnover without having an equally large amount of liquidity available at any one moment.

Based on MEMECOINY's reported figures, WASTED's 24-hour volume was approximately thirteen times its reported liquidity. That comparison is calculated from the figures in the leaderboard; it does not establish how much new capital entered the token or how much could be withdrawn at a particular price.

Nor does a reported volume figure reveal whether traders made profits or losses. The same funds can pass through multiple transactions, and the leaderboard does not provide a complete account of each trader's position or realized result.

For that reason, the reported $1.5 million should be described as trading activity recorded by the data source, not as $1.5 million of new investment or available exit liquidity.

SolanaTerminal Reported Different WASTED Market Figures Later

A separate market-data reading from SolanaTerminal shows why the original 472% figure must be tied to its timestamp.

SolanaTerminal's WASTED page displayed a 24-hour price change of +72.45%, approximately $1.3 million in 24-hour volume and around $53,600 in liquidity in the data returned for this research. The page identifies the same mint address and labels the token as unverified.

Those SolanaTerminal figures differ from MEMECOINY's earlier leaderboard readings. They should not be combined into a single market snapshot because the providers' pages reflect different data captures and potentially different measurement windows or pool coverage.

MEMECOINY's token page also displayed a later reading of approximately $1.52 million in 24-hour volume and $96,950 in liquidity, with a reported 24-hour gain of 142%. The page cautions that market data may be delayed.

Pump.fun's token page showed yet another set of figures in the returned data: approximately $1.38 million in 24-hour volume, $49,310 in pool liquidity and a displayed 616.6% price change. These values are attributed to Pump.fun's page and are not a replacement for MEMECOINY's earlier historical leaderboard.

The different readings demonstrate how quickly meme coin market statistics can change. They also show why reports should identify the data provider and capture time rather than presenting a percentage change as though it were a permanent characteristic of the token.

The WASTED Token's Solana Mint Address

The token covered in this report is identified by the following mint address:

GexThZHgaswpAQ7Fi8QrHFubjPimUNSYhJiAA7XZpump

MEMECOINY's token page identifies the asset as WASTED on Solana and lists pump.fun and PumpSwap in its market information. SolanaTerminal independently displays the same mint address and identifies pump.fun as the launchpad.

The exact mint is important because token names and tickers are not unique identifiers. Other assets can use the same name or ticker, so a market report should be checked against its contract address before its performance or trading activity is attributed to a particular project.

SolanaTerminal also labels this WASTED token as unverified. That is a status displayed by the data provider; it should not be interpreted as proof of fraud or as a complete assessment of the token's contract security.

Why the 472% Increase Does Not Prove a Specific Catalyst

The early leaderboard records a substantial price increase, but the reviewed market-data sources do not establish what caused it.

MEMECOINY's brief provides the ranking and market measurements. SolanaTerminal and Pump.fun provide additional token and trading information. None of these cited figures, on their own, demonstrates that a particular announcement, influencer post, promotion or large-wallet purchase caused the price movement.

It would therefore be inaccurate to attribute the gain to a specific event without separate supporting evidence. A price chart can show when a token moved, but it does not necessarily explain why the move occurred.

The same caution applies to trading volume. A high reported turnover does not automatically mean that new investors entered the market or that demand will continue. It also does not reveal the identity or intentions of the wallets involved.

Liquidity is another important consideration. MEMECOINY's reported $115,400 is a snapshot measurement, not a guarantee that a holder could sell a large position at the displayed price. The amount received in a swap can depend on pool depth, trade size, fees and price impact.

What Do the WASTED Market Figures Actually Establish?

The available data establishes that MEMECOINY ranked WASTED first in its early November 3 top-movers list and reported a 472% 24-hour gain. The same source recorded approximately $1.5 million in volume and $115,400 in liquidity for the token at its stated measurement time.

The later market pages show that the reported price change, volume and liquidity were not static. SolanaTerminal, MEMECOINY's token page and Pump.fun displayed different readings for the same mint. Those figures should remain attributed to their respective providers rather than treated as one unified market record.

The reviewed material does not establish the identities of the traders, their individual profits or losses, or whether the token's trading activity was concentrated among a small number of wallets. It also does not establish whether the reported increase would continue beyond the measured period.

For readers tracking the asset, the mint address and the timestamp attached to each market-data reading are essential. WASTED's reported 472% increase is a notable historical leaderboard result, but it should not be interpreted as a forecast, a guarantee of liquidity or an investment recommendation.

Evidence Limitations

Confirmed as reported by the cited data providers

MEMECOINY's November 3 daily brief reports WASTED at +472.0%, with approximately $1.5 million in 24-hour volume and $115,400 in liquidity. The same leaderboard reports SAFU at +212.0% and FLOAT at +109.0%. MEMECOINY identifies the market-data timestamp as 23:47 UTC on November 2 and says the brief was assembled at 00:06 UTC on November 3.

The WASTED token pages on MEMECOINY, SolanaTerminal and Pump.fun display the mint address GexThZHgaswpAQ7Fi8QrHFubjPimUNSYhJiAA7XZpump and identify the asset as a Solana token.

Claims that remain unverified

The reviewed sources do not establish a specific event, announcement, promotion or wallet transaction as the cause of the reported 472% increase. They also do not establish that the reported trading volume represents an equivalent amount of new capital entering the token.

Information unavailable in the reviewed records

The cited leaderboard does not provide a complete breakdown of trader identities, wallet-level motivations or individual realised profits and losses. The available pages also do not provide one common, provider-independent market-data capture for all reported figures at exactly the same timestamp.

Conclusions that cannot be drawn

The reported gain does not establish that WASTED will continue rising, that the token has sufficient liquidity for every trade size, or that it is a safe investment. Different providers' readings cannot be treated as identical measurements without matching their timestamps and methodologies.